Securiti leads GigaOm's DSPM Vendor Evaluation with top ratings across technical capabilities & business value.

View

LGPD vs GDPR: Key Differences Explained

Get Free GDPR Assessment
Published August 10, 2023 / Updated August 7, 2024
Contributors

Anas Baig

Product Marketing Manager at Securiti

Omer Imran Malik

Senior Data Privacy Consultant at Securiti

FIP, CIPT, CIPM, CIPP/US

Listen to the content

To ensure that consumers get greater control and protection of their personal data, on 25 May 2018, the European Unions General Assembly put the General Data Protection Regulation into effect. In August 2018, the Brazilian government approved its data protection law named Lei Geral de Proteção de Dados Pessoais (LGPD).

Although GDPR and LGPD are closely related (so much so that the LGPD has been dubbed “The Brazillian GDPR”), in purpose and mechanics there are a few key differences that separate the two. Here are some of the key differences between the two laws when it comes to scope, rights and enforcement.


Scope

Both GDPR and LGPD apply to companies that collect and process personal data belonging to the residents in the EU and Brazil respectively, irrespective of the physical presence of the company. Here is a more in-depth comparison between the two regulations:

LGPD_GDPR

Article 1-5

LGPD does not explicitly state whether or not it applies to natural persons irrespective of their nationality or place of residence. However, by way of interpretation of both LGPD and the Brazilian Federal Constitution, it can be inferred that the protection under law applies to personal data of any person, irrespective of the nationality of the data subject.

Moreover, Article 3 of the LGPD provides that the law applies where

  1. data processing is carried out within the territory of Brazil;
  2. data processing of individuals who are located within the territory of Brazil, regardless of where in the world the data processor is located and
  3. data processing being processed were collected in Brazil.
vs

Articles 3, 4(1) Recitals 2, 14, 22-25

GDPR “applies to natural persons, whatever their nationality or place of residence, in relation to the processing of their personal data.”

With regards to extraterritorial scope, GDPR applies to organizations that are not established in the EU, but rather monitor the behaviour of individuals, as long as their behaviour takes place in the EU.


Rights

Both regulations give consumers rights relating to their personal information which they can exercise. The following section explains each right and how they differ across the two laws.

LGPD_GDPR

Data subjects have the right to the deletion of their personal data being processed based upon consent.

A data subject must exercise their right to deletion via express request.

Once this is done, data controllers must “immediately” collect all the data and fulfill the deletion request. If this is not possible, the controller must:

  • (i) send a reply that informs the data subject about processing agents and indicate, whenever possible, who the agent is
  • (ii) indicate the reasons for the delay of immediate adoption
vs

Data subjects' requests under the right to deletion must be responded to without delay and in any event within 1 month of the receipt of the request.

The deadline can be extended to 2 additional months where there is great complexity or depending on the number of requests. In any of these cases, the data subject must be notified of any such extension within one month of receiving the request, along with the reasons for the delay and the possibility of complaining with the supervisory authority.

This right requires the controller to provide the following information to the data subject when requested. The information must be provided in a clear and adequate manner.

  • The specific purpose of the processing
  • The type and duration of the processing
  • The identification of the controller
  • The contact details of the controller
  • The responsibilities of the agents that will carry out the processing.
  • The data subject’s rights

When processing personal data for minors and adolescents, controllers must make public the information about the types of data collected, how it has been used, and the procedures for exercising one’s rights under LGPD. LGPD makes clear that any processing of personal data belonging to children and adolescents shall be done in their best interests.

vs

This right requires the controller to provide the following information to the data subject when requested. This should be given in a concise, transparent, intelligible and easily accessible form, using plain language:

  • The identity and contact details of the controller, controller’s representative and DPO, where applicable
  • The purpose and the legal basis of the processing
  • The categories of personal data concerned
  • The recipients of the personal data
  • The appropriate or suitable safeguards and the means to obtain a copy of them or where they have been made available

The controller must provide information necessary to ensure fair and transparent processing whether or not the personal data is collected from the data subject. This information includes the duration of data storage, the legitimate interests pursued by the controller, and the existence of the rights to access, erasure, rectification, restriction of processing, data portability and lodging a complaint with the supervisory authority.

Under LGPD, data subjects can oppose the processing carried out by the organization, based on one of the situations of waiver of  consent, if there is non-compliance with LGPD.

vs

Data subjects have the right to object to their personal data being processed. This can be done on the basis of legitimate interest or public interest.

Once this right is exercised, the controller must stop processing the individual's data, unless it demonstrates grounds that override the data subject's request.

LGPD requires controllers and processors to provide information on receipt of a data subject’s request. The information must include:

  • The origin date
  • The existence of any records
  • The criteria used
  • The purpose of processing

This information must be provided within 15 days from the date of the data subject’s request.

vs

GDPR states that, when responding to an access request, a data controller must indicate the following:

  • The categories of personal data concerned
  • The recipients or categories of recipients to whom personal data have been disclosed to
  • The retention period
  • The right to lodge a complaint with the supervisory authority
  • The existence of data transfers
  • The existence of automated decision making
  • The information must be provided without undue delay and in any event within one month of the receipt of the request.

LGPD grants the right to data portability  through an express request and subject to commercial and industrial secrecy, pursuant to the regulation of the controlling agency. This right, however, does not include data that has already been anonymised by the controller.

vs

GDPR defines the right to data portability as the right to send data in a “structured, commonly used, and machine-readable format.” This right may be exercised only where it is technically feasible to do so.

LGPD provides data subjects the right to correct inaccurate or out-of-date data.

vs

This is the right of the data subject to obtain from the controller the rectification of inaccurate personal data and to have incomplete personal data completed.

Under LGPD, consumers can exercise their right to revoke their consent with regard to the processing of their data. The controller must inform the data subject about the possibility of revoking consent and the consequences of doing so.

vs

This right applies when the accuracy of data is contested by the data subject, the processing is unlawful and the data subject opposes erasure and requests restriction. Data subjects must be informed before any such restriction is lifted.

Article 20 of the LGPD gives consumers the right to be informed about any automated decision-making, as well as the right to request that decisions be made by a natural person and restrict automated decision making.

vs

Article 22 of the GDPR provides data subjects the right to not be subject to a decision based solely on automated processing, including profiling, that produces legal effects or similarly significantly affects them.


Enforcement

Both GDPR and LGPD allow monetary penalties to be issued in cases of non-compliance. However, the nature of the penalties, the amount, and who is subject to them differ.

LGPD_GDPR

Under the LGPD, the national authority can fine up to a total maximum of BRL 50,000,000 per infraction depending on the severity of the violation.

vs

The GDPR has an upper cap on their monetary penalties at either: 2% of global annual turnover or €10 million, whichever is higher; or 4% of global annual turnover or €20 million, whichever is higher. This depends on the level of violation, which is decided by the member states and public authorities.


Security Measures

Both GDPR and LGPD obligate controllers and processors to adopt security measures to protect the personal data they are processing. LGPD specifies that the new Autoridade Nacional de Proteção de Dados (ANPD) is the federal entity responsible for issuing guidelines and enforcing data protection laws in Brazil. ANPD is empowered to release guidance on which specific security measures are to be adopted.

LGPD_GDPR

The LGPD requires processors and controllers to take possible technical steps to secure the personal data from any data breach. The National Authority for Protection of Data offers minimum technical standards taking into account the nature of information, characteristics of processing, and the current state of technology.

Under LGPD, controllers must notify the National Authority and data subjects of any security incident that may create significant risk or relevant damage to data subjects within three working days.

vs

The GDPR requires organizations to take appropriate technical and organizational measures to ensure the security of the processing of personal information. These measures may include the following:

  • Encryption and pseudonymisation of personal data
  • Ensuring integrity, confidentiality and availability of processing systems
  • Restoring the availability and access to personal data in a timely manner
  • Assessing and evaluating the effectiveness of technical and organisational measures.

Under GDPR, organizations must notify supervisory authorities of any personal data breach that is likely to result in a risk to the rights and freedoms of natural persons without undue delay and not later than 72 hours after having become aware of the breach. The information may also be provided in phases and any delay must be accompanied by justification. The communication of the breach to data subjects, however, must take place without undue delay.


Benefits of automation

Global privacy regulations are encouraging organizations to automate their data privacy operations in order to seamlessly comply. Robotic automation is no longer a want, but rather a need in this current digital landscape. Several organizations are offering software that helps companies comply with global privacy regulations, but these solutions are restricted to mainly process-driven tasks or basic data-driven functions. AUTI is the only software created by securiti.ai, the pioneers of robotic automation, that can be called the perfect software. With its reliability, intelligence and simplicity of use, coupled with ended-to-end automation, AUTI is the only software that can help an organization comply with regulations fully and effectively.


Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Is LGPD the same as GDPR?

LGPD (Lei Geral de Proteção de Dados) and GDPR (General Data Protection Regulation) are both data protection regulations, but they are not the same. LGPD is Brazil's data protection law, while GDPR is the European Union's data protection regulation. While they share common principles and aims of safeguarding individuals' data privacy rights, they have distinct requirements, applicability, and geographic scopes.

What is LGPD compliance?

LGPD compliance refers to adhering to the guidelines and regulations outlined in Brazil's General Data Protection Law (LGPD). Organizations that process the personal data of Brazilian citizens must implement measures to ensure they handle data responsibly, respect individuals' rights, and meet the legal requirements set forth by the LGPD. This includes obtaining proper consent, maintaining data security, providing transparency about data processing practices, and responding to data subject's requests. Non-compliance can result in penalties and fines.

What is GDPR vs CCPA vs LGPD?

GDPR, CCPA, and LGPD are all data protection regulations, but they apply to different regions (EU, California, and Brazil, respectively) and have distinct requirements. They share the goal of protecting individuals' privacy rights, but their specifics differ.

Join Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information, law updates and more delivered to your inbox


Share


More Stories that May Interest You

Videos

View More

Mitigating OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications 2025

Generative AI (GenAI) has transformed how enterprises operate, scale, and grow. There’s an AI application for every purpose, from increasing employee productivity to streamlining...

View More

DSPM vs. CSPM – What’s the Difference?

While the cloud has offered the world immense growth opportunities, it has also introduced unprecedented challenges and risks. Solutions like Cloud Security Posture Management...

View More

Top 6 DSPM Use Cases

With the advent of Generative AI (GenAI), data has become more dynamic. New data is generated faster than ever, transmitted to various systems, applications,...

View More

Colorado Privacy Act (CPA)

What is the Colorado Privacy Act? The CPA is a comprehensive privacy law signed on July 7, 2021. It established new standards for personal...

View More

Securiti for Copilot in SaaS

Accelerate Copilot Adoption Securely & Confidently Organizations are eager to adopt Microsoft 365 Copilot for increased productivity and efficiency. However, security concerns like data...

View More

Top 10 Considerations for Safely Using Unstructured Data with GenAI

A staggering 90% of an organization's data is unstructured. This data is rapidly being used to fuel GenAI applications like chatbots and AI search....

View More

Gencore AI: Building Safe, Enterprise-grade AI Systems in Minutes

As enterprises adopt generative AI, data and AI teams face numerous hurdles: securely connecting unstructured and structured data sources, maintaining proper controls and governance,...

View More

Navigating CPRA: Key Insights for Businesses

What is CPRA? The California Privacy Rights Act (CPRA) is California's state legislation aimed at protecting residents' digital privacy. It became effective on January...

View More

Navigating the Shift: Transitioning to PCI DSS v4.0

What is PCI DSS? PCI DSS (Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard) is a set of security standards to ensure safe processing, storage, and...

View More

Securing Data+AI : Playbook for Trust, Risk, and Security Management (TRiSM)

AI's growing security risks have 48% of global CISOs alarmed. Join this keynote to learn about a practical playbook for enabling AI Trust, Risk,...

Spotlight Talks

Spotlight 14:21

AI Governance Is Much More than Technology Risk Mitigation

AI Governance Is Much More than Technology Risk Mitigation
Watch Now View
Spotlight 12:!3

You Can’t Build Pipelines, Warehouses, or AI Platforms Without Business Knowledge

Watch Now View
Spotlight 47:42

Cybersecurity – Where Leaders are Buying, Building, and Partnering

Rehan Jalil
Watch Now View
Spotlight 27:29

Building Safe AI with Databricks and Gencore

Rehan Jalil
Watch Now View
Spotlight 46:02

Building Safe Enterprise AI: A Practical Roadmap

Watch Now View
Spotlight 13:32

Ensuring Solid Governance Is Like Squeezing Jello

Watch Now View
Spotlight 40:46

Securing Embedded AI: Accelerate SaaS AI Copilot Adoption Safely

Watch Now View
Spotlight 10:05

Unstructured Data: Analytics Goldmine or a Governance Minefield?

Viral Kamdar
Watch Now View
Spotlight 21:30

Companies Cannot Grow If CISOs Don’t Allow Experimentation

Watch Now View
Spotlight 2:48

Unlocking Gen AI For Enterprise With Rehan Jalil

Rehan Jalil
Watch Now View

Latest

View More

From Trial to Trusted: Securely Scaling Microsoft Copilot in the Enterprise

AI copilots and agents embedded in SaaS are rapidly reshaping how enterprises work. Business leaders and IT teams see them as a gateway to...

The ROI of Safe Enterprise AI View More

The ROI of Safe Enterprise AI: A Business Leader’s Guide

The fundamental truth of today’s competitive landscape is that businesses harnessing data through AI will outperform those that don’t. Especially with 90% of enterprise...

Understanding Data Regulations in Australia’s Telecom Sector View More

Understanding Data Regulations in Australia’s Telecom Sector

1. Introduction Australia’s telecommunications sector plays a crucial role in connecting millions of people. However, with this connectivity comes the responsibility of safeguarding vast...

Data Security Governance View More

Data Security Governance: Key Principles and Best Practices for Protection

Learn about Data Security Governance, its importance in protecting sensitive data, ensuring compliance, and managing risks. Best practices for securing data.

ROPA View More

Records of Processing Activities (RoPA): A Cross-Jurisdictional Analysis

Download the whitepaper to gain a cross-jurisdictional analysis of records of processing activities (RoPA). Learn what RoPA is, why organizations should maintain it, and...

Managing Privacy Risks in Large Language Models (LLMs) View More

Managing Privacy Risks in Large Language Models (LLMs)

Download the whitepaper to learn how to manage privacy risks in large language models (LLMs). Gain comprehensive insights to avoid violations.

Comparison of RoPA Field Requirements Across Jurisdictions View More

Comparison of RoPA Field Requirements Across Jurisdictions

Download the infographic to compare Records of Processing Activities (RoPA) field requirements across jurisdictions. Learn its importance, penalties, and how to navigate RoPA.

Navigating Kenya’s Data Protection Act View More

Navigating Kenya’s Data Protection Act: What Organizations Need To Know

Download the infographic to discover key details about navigating Kenya’s Data Protection Act and simplify your compliance journey.

Gencore AI and Amazon Bedrock View More

Building Enterprise-Grade AI with Gencore AI and Amazon Bedrock

Learn how to build secure enterprise AI copilots with Amazon Bedrock models, protect AI interactions with LLM Firewalls, and apply OWASP Top 10 LLM...

DSPM Vendor Due Diligence View More

DSPM Vendor Due Diligence

DSPM’s Buyer Guide ebook is designed to help CISOs and their teams ask the right questions and consider the right capabilities when looking for...

What's
New