Securiti launches Gencore AI, a holistic solution to build Safe Enterprise AI with proprietary data - easily

View

Navigating Privacy Laws: GDPR vs Australia Privacy Act

Contributors

Anas Baig

Product Marketing Manager at Securiti

Syeda Eimaan Gardezi

Associate Data Privacy Analyst at Securiti

Salma Khan

Associate Data Privacy Analyst

CIPP/Asia

Listen to the content

In today’s data-driven era where data is sprawling across the digital landscape, navigating the complexities of evolving privacy laws is not just important—it’s essential for organizations operating across multiple jurisdictions.

From Europe to Oceania, two landmark legislations, the European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and the Australian Privacy Act (APA), set comprehensive frameworks for protecting personal data and ensuring compliance with stringent privacy standards.

Overview of GDPR and APA

The GDPR, which came into effect on May 25, 2018, is a comprehensive data protection regulation that applies to all EU member states. It aims to harmonize data privacy laws across Europe, protect EU citizens' data privacy, and reshape how organizations across the region approach data privacy. The GDPR is enforced by the European Data Protection Board (EDPB) and individual Data Protection Authorities (DPAs) in each EU member state.

The APA is the key legislation governing the handling of personal information in Australia. It was significantly amended by the Privacy Amendment (Enhancing Privacy Protection) Act 2012, which introduced the Australian Privacy Principles (APPs). These principles apply to both Australian government agencies and private sector organizations with an annual turnover exceeding AUD 3 million (APP entities), as well as some smaller organizations under specific conditions. The Office of the Australian Information Commissioner (OAIC) enforces the APA.

While both share the common goal of safeguarding privacy, they differ in scope, application, and enforcement. This comparative analysis delves into the intricacies of GDPR and the APA, highlighting their key similarities and differences and providing insights for businesses striving to maintain compliance in an increasingly complex global landscape.

Territorial Scope

This table compares the GDPR’s territorial scope and reach with the APA.

Aspect

GDPR

Article 3

APA 

Section 5,5B, 6

Applicability to Organizations The GDPR applies to the processing of personal data by organizations (data controllers and processors) established in the EU, regardless of whether the processing takes place in the EU or not. The APA applies to APP entities (including government agencies, large businesses, and some small business agencies or organizations) and extends to all of Australia's external territories.

The APP entities include government agencies and private sector organizations with an annual turnover exceeding AUD 3 million, along with smaller entities in specific categories, such as health service providers and businesses trading in personal information.

The APA also applies to organizations with an Australian link. Entities considered to have an Australian link include an Australian citizen or a person with permanent residency in Australia, a partnership/trust/ body corporate formed or incorporated in Australia, or an unincorporated association whose central management and control are based in Australia.

Applicability to Foreign Entities Applies to non-EU organizations if they offer goods/services to or monitor the behavior of EU individuals. APA applies to organizations or small business owners that are regarded as APP entities and conduct business in Australia even if they do not have a physical presence there.
Key insights:

  • Both the GDPR and the APA have extraterritorial reach, thus, compelling international compliance.

Material Scope

This table highlights the material scope of GDPR and the APA.

Aspect

GDPR

Article 2, 4(2)

APA 

Section 3, 6C(4), 7B, 16

Type of Processing The GDPR applies to the processing of personal data by automated means (wholly or partly), as well as non-automated processing when the data is part of, or intended to be part of, a filing system. The APA applies to the collection, holding, use, correction, or disclosure of personal information by an APP entity.
Processing The GDPR refers to processing as any actions taken on personal data, whether or not by automated means, including collection, recording, organization, structuring, storage, adaptation, or alteration of data. It also includes data retrieval, consultation, use, disclosure by transmission, dissemination or otherwise making available, alignment or combination, restriction, erasure, or destruction. The APA does not use the term or define processing.
Exemptions The GDPR exempts the following types of data processing activities:

  • anonymous data that cannot be linked to any individual;
  • personal data used solely for personal or household activities, excluding business or professional purposes; and
  • data processing by law enforcement or national security agencies.
The APP exempts the following types of data processing activities:

  • personal information handled for personal, family, or household purposes;
  • acts by individuals outside of business activities; and
  • employee records and journalistic practices.
Key insights:

  • Thus, the GDPR has a broader material scope and provides a definition of  ‘processing’. In comparison, the APA  does not define ‘processing’. However, as per Section 3, it applies to the ‘collection, holding, use, correction or disclosure of personal information.

Key Definitions

While both laws aim to protect personal data, the GDPR and the APA define key terms differently.

Term

GDPR

Article 4,9

APA 

Section 6, 26WA, APP11

Personal Data under GDPR

Personal Information under APA

Personal data refers to any information related to an identified or identifiable natural person. This identification can be direct (like using their name) or indirect (such as through an identifier like a number, location, or online data). It also includes unique physical, genetic, mental, economic, cultural, or social characteristics that could identify the person. In comparison, the equivalent term used in APA is ‘personal information’ and refers to information/opinions about an identified or reasonably identifiable individual:

  •  whether the information or opinion is true or not; and
  • whether the information or opinion is recorded in a material form or not.

Thus, while the GDPR focuses on specific identifiers and indirect identification, the APA takes a broader approach, including opinions as well as information.

Consent Any freely given, specific, informed, and unambiguous indication of the data subject’s wishes via a statement or by a clear affirmative action that signifies agreement to the processing of their personal data.

Individuals have the right to withdraw their consent at any time, where consent is the legal basis for processing.

In the APA , consent is not defined according to its characteristics, rather it is categorized as express consent or implied consent.

Express consent occurs when it is given clearly and explicitly, either verbally or in writing, such as by signing your name. On the other hand, implied consent is when an organization reasonably believes they have permission to handle non-sensitive personal information without explicit verbal or written consent.

Similar to the GDPR, consent can be withdrawn at any time.

Sensitive Data under GDPR

Sensitive Information under the APA

Under the GDPR, sensitive personal data includes:

  • racial or ethnic origin;
  • political opinions;
  • religious or philosophical beliefs;
  • trade-union membership;
  • genetic data;
  • biometric data processed solely to identify a human being;
  • health-related data; or
  • data concerning a person’s sex life or sexual orientation.
Comparatively, the APA contains a more detailed list of information that would be categorized as sensitive, although most of them are similar to the GDPR. It includes  information or an opinion about an individual’s:

  • racial or ethnic origin;
  • political opinions, religious beliefs or affiliations;
  • philosophical beliefs;
  •  membership of a professional or trade association and unions;
  • sexual orientation or practices; criminal record;
  • health information
  • genetic information
  • biometric information used for automated biometric verification or biometric identification; or
  • biometric templates.
Pseudonymization The processing of personal data in a way that it can't be linked to an individual without extra information,  provided that such additional information is kept separately and is subject to technical and organizational measures to ensure that the personal data are not attributed to an individual. The APA does not define pseudonymization. However, it defines 'de-identified' information as information that no longer identifies an individual (i.e., a natural person).
Controller The natural or legal person, public authority, agency, or other body which, alone or jointly with others, determines the purposes and means of the processing of personal data. If Union or Member State law defines these purposes and methods, the controller or criteria for appointing one may also be specified by the Union or Member State law. The APA does not define a data controller or distinguish between data controllers and data processors. Instead, it provides the concept of 'APP entities.  It includes private organizations such as individuals, corporate bodies, partnerships, unincorporated associations, trusts, and Commonwealth Government agencies with an annual turnover exceeding AUD 3 million, whether they are acting as data controllers or processors.
Processor A natural or legal person, public authority, agency, or other body which processes personal data on behalf of the controller. As stated before, the APA does not define data processors. Instead, it provides the concept of 'APP entities', which encompasses both data controllers and data processors.
Data Subject GDPR specifies that a data subjectis 'an identified or identifiable natural person' to whom the personal data is related to. The APA does not define a data subject.
Data Breach A security incident that results in the accidental or illegal destruction, loss, alteration, unauthorized disclosure of, or access to, personal data that is transmitted, stored, or otherwise processed. The equivalent terminology in the APA is ‘eligible data breach’. It occurs when personal information held by an entity is accessed, disclosed, or lost without authorization, and this breach is likely to cause serious harm to the affected individuals.
Key insights:

  • The GDPR’s definition of personal data includes both direct and indirect identifiers of individuals. The APA takes a broader approach, including information and opinions about identifiable individuals.
  • GDPR mandates consent to be explicit, informed, and unambiguous. In contrast, the APA distinguishes between express consent (clearly given) and implied consent (reasonably inferred). Both laws address sensitive data/information, but the GDPR’s list is more focused, while the APA includes additional categories like criminal records.
  • The GDPR defines pseudonymization as processing that separates data from an individual, with additional safeguards. The APA lacks a pseudonymization definition but uses ‘de-identified’ to describe data that no longer identifies an individual.
  • GDPR clearly defines data controllers and processors with specific roles. The APA broadly uses the term ‘APP entities’ to cover all entities involved in data handling without distinct definitions for controllers and processors.

Obligations of Data Controllers & Processors

The GDPR refers to applicable organizations as ‘data controllers or data processors’, while the APA refers to applicable entities as ‘APP entities’.

GDPR

APA 

Article 6

APP 3

The lawful basis for processing data are:

  • the data subject has given consent for specific purposes;
  • it is necessary for the performance of a contract or to take steps prior to a contract at the data subject's request;
  • it is needed to comply with a legal obligation;
  • it is necessary to protect the vital interests of the data subject or another individual;
  • it is required for tasks carried out in the public interest or under official authority; and
  • it is necessary for the legitimate interests of the controller or a third party, provided these interests are not outweighed by the rights or interests of the data subject.
An entity may only collect personal information that is necessary for its functions or activities and must do so by lawful and fair means.

Additionally, collecting sensitive information requires the individual’s consent unless an exception applies.

Data Security & Accountability

GDPR

APA

Article 24, 32

APP 11

Organizations should implement appropriate technical and organizational measures to ensure a level of security appropriate to the risk. These measures should consider the latest technology, costs, and the nature of the processing, and include:

  • pseudonymization and encryption of personal data;
  • ensuring the confidentiality, integrity, availability, and resilience of processing systems;
  • the ability to restore access to personal data promptly after an incident; and
  • regular testing and evaluation of security measures.

The level of security should be determined based on the risks, particularly those involving accidental or unlawful destruction, loss, alteration, or unauthorized access to personal data.

As per, APA’s security requirements "reasonable steps" should be taken to ensure both technical, physical and organizational measures are present to secure data.

Data Minimization

GDPR

APA

Article 5(c)

APP 3

Limit the collection of personal data to what is directly relevant, necessary and limited to accomplish a specified purpose. While this is not a separate provision for data minimization, APP entities are also required to collect personal information only when necessary for one or more of the entity’s functions or activities and by lawful and fair means.

Privacy Policy

GDPR

APA

Article 12,13,14, Recital 39

APP 1.3, APP 1.4

Privacy notice must be provided at the time when personal data is obtained. It must be:

  • concise;
  • transparent;
  • easily accessible;
  • written in clear language (especially if it pertains to children); and
  • written or electronic form, or even orally upon request with appropriate identity verification.

The notice should include specific details based on whether the personal data is collected directly from individuals or indirectly from third parties. Moreover, when collecting data directly, the notice must disclose:

  • the organization's identity;
  • contact details of the data protection officer;
  • purpose and legal basis for processing personal data;
  • recipients of the data;
  • details of any international transfers with appropriate safeguards;
  • the period for which data will be stored;
  • information about data subject rights and how to exercise them;
  • the right to revoke consent at any time;
  • the data subject's right to complain to a supervisory authority;
  • the existence of automated decision-making, including profiling; and
  • whether providing personal data is mandatory under legal or contractual obligations.

When personal data is obtained indirectly from third parties, the notice, in addition to the above information, must also include:

  • Information about the categories and sources of data.
  • Clarification if the data was obtained from publicly available sources, ensuring transparency and compliance with the GDPR requirements.
Must have a privacy policy outlining the management of personal information. It should be available without charge and in an appropriate manner, including:

  • the organization's name and contact details;
  • types of personal information collected;
  • collection and storage methods
  • reasons for data collection;
  • usage and disclosure of personal information;
  • access and correction procedures
  • complaint process for mishandling; and
  • potential overseas disclosures and, if possible, the countries involved.

Contracts

GDPR APA
Article 28 Section 95B
Data controllers should ensure data processing agreements are in place with processors. The APA does not explicitly require APP entities to engage in contracts with subcontractors and other agencies. However, APP 8 (Cross-border disclosure of personal information) implies the need for contractual agreements as when an APP entity discloses personal information to an overseas recipient. This is because it remains accountable for any actions or practices of the recipient that would violate the APPs, unless certain exceptions apply. Thus, they must take reasonable steps, such as creating valid contracts to ensure that none of the APPs are breached.

Moreover, Section 95B of the APA requires agencies entering into Commonwealth contracts (Commonwealth or an agency) to include provisions ensuring that contracted service providers do not engage in practices that would breach the APPs.

Transparency

GDPR

APA

Article 12

APP 1

Ensure transparency in data processing activities, providing clear and accessible information to data subjects. Entities should have open and transparent management of personal information.

Direct Marketing

GDPR

APA

Article 21(2), Recital 47

Directive 2002/58/EU Article 13(1)(2)

APP 7

Under the GDPR, for direct marketing organizations

  • must either obtain explicit consent from individuals, or
  • demonstrate that the marketing activities fall within their legitimate interests.

Moreover, recipients must always be able to opt out of further communications, and every marketing message must include a clear opt-out option.

Marketing is allowed with consent for information collected indirectly, or if obtaining consent is impractical, provided an opt-out is offered.

Organizations cannot use personal information for direct marketing unless certain conditions are met. There are:

  • if the information was collected from the individual;
  • the individual would reasonably expect it to be used; and
  • a clear opt-out option is provided.

In addition, individuals have the right to opt out of marketing and request the source of their information, and organizations must promptly respond to these requests.

Data Transfer

GDPR APA
Article 44-50 APP 8
Under the GDPR, data controllers must inform data subjects about planned data transfers outside the EU during data collection, specifying whether the destination has an EU adequacy decision or relies on safeguards.

Permitted transfers include:

  • Adequacy Decision: The EU Commission confirms the destination country offers adequate protection.
  • Appropriate Safeguards: These include binding corporate rules, standard clauses, approved codes of conduct, certification mechanisms, or legal agreements between public authorities.
  • Derogations: Allowed in specific cases, such as explicit consent, contractual necessity, public interest, legal claims, vital interests, or when data comes from a public register.

If the transfer cannot be based on adequacy requirements or appropriate safeguards and no derogations apply, transfers may still occur if they are non-repetitive, involve a limited number of data subjects, are necessary for compelling legitimate interests, and have suitable safeguards. The controller must notify both the supervisory authority and the data subject of the compelling legitimate interest.

Data transfer obligations in the APA differ from those in the GDPR. Data can be transferred to a third country. However, the recipient country must have a law or binding rules that protect personal information, similar to safeguards employed by Australia.

Moreover, an APP entity that discloses personal information to an overseas recipient remains accountable for any actions or practices of the recipient that would violate the APPs unless certain exceptions apply (16C). Other legal grounds for data transfers include:

  • compliance with Australian laws or court orders;
  • explicit consent from the data subject, with acknowledgment of the lack of APP enforcement; or
  • transfers by Commonwealth Government agencies under international agreements or for enforcement activities.

Furthermore, disclosure is permitted in the following circumstances:

  • lessening or preventing a serious threat to life, health or safety;
  • taking appropriate action in relation to suspected unlawful activity or serious misconduct;
  • locating a person reported as missing;
  • necessary for a diplomatic or consular function or activity; and
  • necessary for certain defence force activities outside Australia.

Records of Processing Activities (RoPA)

GDPR APA
Article 30 N/A
Organizations need to maintain records of processing activities. This includes documenting:

  • purposes of data processing;
  • categories of data subjects and personal data;
  • data retention periods;
  • data transfers to third countries;
  • time limits for the erasure of different data categories (if possible); and
  • technical and organizational security measures in place to protect the data.
While in the APA, there is no specific RoPA requirement.

Data Protection Impact Assessment (DPIA) And Privacy Impact Assessments (PIA)

GDPR APA
Article 35 APP 1, 33D
Data controllers must conduct a Data Protection Impact Assessment (DPIA) when there's a high risk to data subjects, such as with automated profiling, large-scale sensitive data processing, or extensive public area monitoring. A DPIA includes:

  • descriptions of processing activities and purposes;
  • assessment of necessity, proportionality, and risks; and
  • strategies and safeguards to mitigate risks.

The data protection officer should be involved in the DPIA if one is appointed.

The OAIC may direct an agency to give a privacy impact assessment. Moreover, organizations are encouraged to conduct a PIA when undertaking new projects or initiatives that involve handling personal information, or when making significant changes to existing data-handling practices. It involves:

  • identifying privacy risks;
  • assessing compliance;
  • engaging with affected parties to understand their privacy concerns and expectations; and
  • implementing safeguards.

Data Protection Officer (DPO)

GDPR APA
Article 37 N/A
A data protection officer (DPO) must be appointed by the controller or processor when:

  • processing is conducted by a public authority or body (excluding courts in their judicial capacity),
  • core activities involve large-scale processing requiring regular and systematic monitoring of data subjects, or
  • core activities involve large-scale processing of special categories of data or data related to criminal convictions and offenses.

The contact details of the DPO must be published and communicated to the supervisory authority.

The APA does not require the appointment of a DPO. However, organizations may appoint one as a best practice.

Data Breach Notification

GDPR APA
Articles 33, 34 Notifiable Data Breaches Scheme
Organizations must notify the relevant DPA and affected individuals of a data breach without undue delay and, where feasible, within 72 hours. Under the Notifiable Data Breaches Scheme, the Government supports the principle that entities should inform the OAIC within 72 hours of discovering a data breach likely to create the risk of serious harm. Moreover, they need to notify affected individuals as soon as possible (potentially in stages if needed), and take reasonable measures to establish practices, procedures, and systems to address data breaches effectively.

Third-Party Obligations

GDPR APA
Article 28 APP 11
The GDPR requires data processing agreements to ensure processors:

  • act only on the controller’s documented instructions.
  • implement appropriate security measures.
  • assist with data protection obligations, including responding to rights requests and conducting impact assessments.
  • maintain records of processing activities.
  • engage contracted sub-processors only and with the prior written agreement of the data controller.
  • notify the controller of data breaches promptly.
  • delete or return data after processing ends, unless legally required to retain it.
  • provide information for GDPR compliance and support audits.
The APA does not specify obligations for third parties. Instead, it applies to any entity that 'holds' personal information, whether by physically possessing the data (such as an outsourced provider/third party) or controlling it.

Consequently, third parties that process information are also responsible for implementing security measures and ensuring compliance with the APPs.

Respond to Authorities

GDPR APA 
Article 31 N/A
The GDPR requires organizations to cooperate with supervisory authorities and respond to their requests. This includes providing information, allowing inspections, and taking corrective actions as directed Similarly, APP entities must cooperate with the OAIC and respond appropriately to their requests.

Complain to Authorities

GDPR APA 
Article 77 Section 36.1
Individuals have the right to lodge a complaint with a supervisory authority if they consider that the processing of their personal data infringes the GDPR. Similarly, individuals can lodge a complaint with the OAIC if they believe their privacy has been interfered with.

Data Subject Rights

Right to be Informed
GDPR

Articles 12, 13, and 14

APA

 N/A

Individuals have the right to be informed about the collection and use of their personal data. No direct equivalent under the APA.
Right of Access
GDPR

Article 15

APA

(APP 12)

Individuals have the right to access their personal data and information about how it is being processed. Individuals have the right to access their personal information held by an organization.
Right to Rectification
GDPR

Article 16

APA

APP 13

Individuals can request the correction of inaccurate or incomplete personal data. Entities must take reasonable steps to correct personal information to ensure it is accurate, up-to-date, and complete.
Right to Erasure
GDPR

Article 17

APA

APP 11.2

Individuals can request the deletion of their personal data in certain circumstances. No direct equivalent, but entities must take reasonable steps to destroy or de-identify personal information that is no longer needed.
Right to Restriction of Processing
GDPR

Article 18

APA
Individuals can request the restriction of processing of their personal data in certain circumstances. No direct equivalent under the APA.
Right to Data Portability
GDPR

Article 20

APA
Individuals can request that their personal data be transferred to another service provider in a structured, commonly used, and machine-readable format. No direct equivalent under the APA.
Right to Object
GDPR

Article 21

APA

APP 7

Individuals can object to the processing of their personal data in certain circumstances, including for direct marketing purposes. No direct equivalent under the APA.
Rights related to Automated Decision Making and Profiling
GDPR

Article 22

APA
Individuals have the right not to be subject to a decision based solely on automated processing, including profiling, which produces legal effects or similarly significantly affects them. No direct equivalent under the APA.

Enforcement

Regulatory Authority
GDPR

Article 68

APA 

OAIC Website: Guide to Privacy Regulatory Action

European Data Protection Board (EDPB) and individual Data Protection Authorities (DPAs) in each EU member state. Office of the Australian Information Commissioner (OAIC).
Investigative Powers
GDPR

Article 58

APA

 Section 40

DPAs have the power to conduct investigations and data protection audits. OAIC also has the power to conduct investigations, either in response to complaints or on its own initiative.
Corrective Powers
GDPR

Article 58

APA

 Part V

DPAs can issue warnings, reprimands, orders to comply, and impose temporary or definitive limitations, including bans on processing. Similarly, the OAIC can make determinations requiring entities to take specific actions to comply with the law.
Fines and Penalties
GDPR

Article 83

APA 

Section 13G

DPAs can impose administrative fines of up to €20 million or 4% of the annual global turnover, whichever is higher. OAIC can seek civil penalties through the Federal Court, with fines up to $2.5 million for individuals and $50 million for a body corporate or three times the benefit gained from the violation or, if that’s not possible to calculate, 30% of the company’s adjusted turnover during the breach period.
Compliance Notices
GDPR

Article 58

APA

Section 52

DPAs can issue compliance notices requiring organizations to take specified steps to comply with the GDPR. OAIC can issue enforceable directions requiring entities to take specific steps to comply with the APA.
Publicity of Actions
GDPR

Article 58

APA

Section 28(2)

DPAs may make public any measures or sanctions imposed. OAIC may publish information about its regulatory activities, including investigation reports and determinations.
Appeals and Remedies
GDPR

Article 78

APA

Section 96

Individuals have the right to an effective judicial remedy against a supervisory authority's legally binding decisions. Individuals can seek a review of OAIC decisions through the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT) or the Federal Court.
Cross-border Cooperation
GDPR

Article 60-67

APA

OAIC Website: International Networks

DPAs cooperate through the EDPB to ensure consistent application of the GDPR across the EU. OAIC can cooperate with international data protection authorities to address cross-border privacy issues and challenges regarding data protection.
Key insights:

  • Both GDPR and the APA grant substantial investigatory authority, including on-site audits, though the GDPR provides a more detailed framework. The two legislations also offer a range of compliance actions.
  • GDPR fines can be up to 4% of global turnover, making them generally higher than the APA's maximum penalties, which are based on benefits gained or turnover.
  • Both regulations allow for public disclosure of enforcement actions, with the GDPR specifically covering sanctions and the APA encompassing broader regulatory activities.

How Securiti Can Help

Securiti Module Module Description
Data Classification Securiti leverages advanced machine learning to automatically discover, classify, and categorize confidentially, restricted, and public data based on sensitivity and criticality. This ensures compliance with GDPR and the Australia Privacy Act by providing robust data classification protocols that are continuously updated and refined.
Data Privacy Securiti ensures data privacy by implementing end-to-end encryption, both at rest and in transit, role-based access controls to limit data access to authorized personnel, and advanced data anonymization techniques to share data securely. It connects to structured and unstructured data systems and automatically discovers and builds relationship maps between personal data and unique identities, safeguarding sensitive data throughout its lifecycle.
Data Mapping Securiti enables real-time data mapping and maps out all the personal data, making it easier to identify the location of data and the data subject's residency. Organizations can visualize global data maps to monitor cross-border traffic and key data patterns, discover new data to update the data catalog dynamically and initiate PIAs and DPIAs to update the risk register.
Data Governance Securiti leverages AI/ML technologies, enabling organizations to build a comprehensive data catalog, understand data lineage and policy management, maintain detailed audit trails, and offer comprehensive reporting functionalities. By providing tools to manage data governance effectively, Securiti ensures alignment with GDPR and the Australia Privacy Act.
Generative Artificial Intelligence Governance (AI Governance) Securiti’s Genstack AI Suite removes the complexities and risks inherent in the GenAI lifecycle, empowering organizations to swiftly and safely utilize their structured and unstructured data anywhere with any AI and LLMs. It provides features such as secure data ingestion and extraction, data masking, anonymization, and redaction, as well as indexing and retrieval capabilities. Additionally, it facilitates the configuration of LLMs for Q&A, inline data controls for governance, privacy, and security, and LLM firewalls to enable the safe adoption of GenAI.
Sensitive Data Catalog Securiti’s sensitive data catalog identifies personal and sensitive data in structured and unstructured assets across on-premise, hybrid & multicloud data assets, enabling swift compliance with GDPR and the APA’s privacy, security, and governance requirements.
Data Security Management Securiti’s data security management enables organizations to leverage granular insights and discover the security posture of data assets across on-premise, IaaS, SaaS, and data clouds. Prevent unauthorized access to sensitive data, monitor data risk, and analyze whose data may be impacted by a data breach and which regulations apply.
Consent Management Securiti’s consent management simplifies the management of first-party and third-party consent, enabling organizations to obtain, record, track, and manage individuals' explicit consent. This includes customizable consent forms and automated tracking of consent status.
Data Subject Access Requests Securiti’s data subject request provides a user-friendly interface, empowering data subjects to exercise their rights under GDPR and the APA. Organizations can build customized DSR forms and leverage robotic automation to fulfill requests timely and efficiently. Automated workflows ensure these requests are handled efficiently and transparently.
Workflow Orchestration Securiti’s workflow orchestration automates security, privacy, and governance functions with an intuitive workflow orchestration engine. Organizations can leverage built-in integrations and customizable triggers to streamline operations, reduce costs, and improve accuracy.
Privacy Policy Management Securiti’s privacy policy management enables organizations to rapidly build and deploy privacy notices, automate updates, and easily manage hundreds of privacy and cookie policies and notices via a unified privacy dashboard.
Data Risk Managamenet Securiti’s data risk management enables organizations to identify vulnerabilities, assess high-risk data sets based on risk scores, remediate high-risk by ranking data risk in their environment with custom risk profiles, and visually monitor any sudden changes in risk scores to reduce the attack surface.
Risk Assessments Securiti’s Risk Assessment automates an organization’s records of processing (RoPA) reports, privacy impact assessments, and data protection impact assessments aligning with global privacy regulations. Organizations can swiftly identify and mitigate privacy risks with integrated regulatory knowledge, flexible templates, and progress tracking.
Breach Management Securiti’s Breach Management provides incident response workflows that help organizations respond to privacy incidents in a timely and effective manner. This is important because, under the GDPR and APA, organizations are required to take reasonable steps to protect personal information from unauthorized access, disclosure, alteration, misuse, or deletion before processing it.

Request a demo to learn more.

Join Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information, law updates and more delivered to your inbox


Share


More Stories that May Interest You

What's
New