Article 31: Requirements Related To Notified Bodies : EU AI Act

Contributors

Anas Baig

Product Marketing Manager at Securiti

Rohma Fatima Qayyum

Associate Data Privacy Analyst at Securiti

Semra Islam

Sr. Data Privacy Analyst

CIPM, CIPP/Europe

Article 31 of the AI Act provides useful information regarding the various requirements that notified bodies are subject to.

A notified body shall be established as a legal entity under the national law of each EU member state. Notified bodies will be required to satisfy all relevant organizational, quality management, resources, and process requirements necessary to fulfill their tasks and other suitable cybersecurity requirements.

The organizational structure, allocation of responsibilities, reporting lines and operation of notified bodies shall ensure confidence in their performance and in the results of their conformity assessment activities.

The notified bodies shall be independent of the provider of a high-risk AI system in relation to which they perform conformity assessment procedures. Similarly, they shall be independent of any other operator with economic interests in the high-risk AI system being assessed or any of the provider’s competitors. However, this requirement does not extend to the use of high-risk AI systems that are necessary for the operations of the conformity assessment body or are strictly used for personal purposes.

The top-level management of the conformity assessment body or its personnel responsible for carrying out conformity assessment tasks shall not be involved in the design, development, marketing, or use of high-risk AI systems, nor shall they represent the parties that may be involved in those activities. Such individuals shall be required to refrain from engaging in any activity that may compromise their independence of judgment or integrity with respect to the performance of conformity assessment activities for which they are notified. This obligation applies to consultancy services in particular.

The notified bodies shall be organized and operated to safeguard the objectivity, independence, and impartiality of their activities. They shall have a comprehensive documentation mechanism and necessary structure and procedures in place to safeguard impartiality throughout their organization, personnel, and assessment activities.

The aforementioned documentation mechanism shall also ensure the confidentiality of any information that comes into the possession of the notified bodies’ personnel, committees, subsidiaries, subcontractors, or any associated body or personnel. Confidentiality shall be maintained as per Article 78 requirements during the conformity assessment activities, except when the disclosure of the information is required by law. The staff of the notified bodies shall also be bound to observe professional secrecy concerning all information obtained in carrying out their tasks under the EU’s AI Act, except in relation to the notifying authorities of the EU member state in which their activities are carried out.

The notified bodies’ procedures must take due account the size of the provider subject to the conformity assessment, its sector of operation, structure, and the degree of complexity of the AI system being assessed.

Additionally, notified bodies shall ensure their participation in coordination activities as required under Article 38 and take necessary steps to ensure their due participation in European standardization organizations or ensure that they are aware of and up to date with relevant standards.

The notified body must take out appropriate liability insurance for all their conformity assessment activities unless the member state in which they are established assumes liability in accordance with the relevant national law or that the member state is itself directly responsible for the conformity assessment.

Lastly, the notified bodies shall be capable of carrying out their tasks under the AI Act with the highest degree of professional integrity and competence, whether those tasks are carried out by the notified bodies themselves or on their behalf and under their responsibility. The notified bodies shall also be required to have sufficient internal competency to assess any tasks conducted by external parties on their behalf.

To that end, they shall ensure the permanent availability of sufficient administrative, technical, legal, and scientific personnel with the appropriate experience and knowledge regarding the relevant types of AI systems, data and data computing, and regarding the requirements set out in Section 2 of the EU’s AI Act.

Join Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information, law updates and more delivered to your inbox


Share

More Stories that May Interest You
Videos
View More
Rehan Jalil, Veeam on Agent Commander : theCUBE + NYSE Wired: Cyber Security Leaders
Following Veeam’s acquisition of Securiti, the launch of Agent Commander marks an important step toward helping enterprises adopt AI agents with greater confidence. In...
View More
Mitigating OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications 2025
Generative AI (GenAI) has transformed how enterprises operate, scale, and grow. There’s an AI application for every purpose, from increasing employee productivity to streamlining...
View More
Top 6 DSPM Use Cases
With the advent of Generative AI (GenAI), data has become more dynamic. New data is generated faster than ever, transmitted to various systems, applications,...
View More
Colorado Privacy Act (CPA)
What is the Colorado Privacy Act? The CPA is a comprehensive privacy law signed on July 7, 2021. It established new standards for personal...
View More
Securiti for Copilot in SaaS
Accelerate Copilot Adoption Securely & Confidently Organizations are eager to adopt Microsoft 365 Copilot for increased productivity and efficiency. However, security concerns like data...
View More
Top 10 Considerations for Safely Using Unstructured Data with GenAI
A staggering 90% of an organization's data is unstructured. This data is rapidly being used to fuel GenAI applications like chatbots and AI search....
View More
Gencore AI: Building Safe, Enterprise-grade AI Systems in Minutes
As enterprises adopt generative AI, data and AI teams face numerous hurdles: securely connecting unstructured and structured data sources, maintaining proper controls and governance,...
View More
Navigating CPRA: Key Insights for Businesses
What is CPRA? The California Privacy Rights Act (CPRA) is California's state legislation aimed at protecting residents' digital privacy. It became effective on January...
View More
Navigating the Shift: Transitioning to PCI DSS v4.0
What is PCI DSS? PCI DSS (Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard) is a set of security standards to ensure safe processing, storage, and...
View More
Securing Data+AI : Playbook for Trust, Risk, and Security Management (TRiSM)
AI's growing security risks have 48% of global CISOs alarmed. Join this keynote to learn about a practical playbook for enabling AI Trust, Risk,...

Spotlight Talks

Spotlight 59:11
Data Controls for AI: Findings from the 2026 GigaOm DSPM Research
Watch Now View
Spotlight 1:02:06
Consent by proxy: When AI agents start deciding for us
Watch Now View
Spotlight 1:00:41
Future-Proofing for the Privacy Professional
Watch Now View
Spotlight 50:52
From Data to Deployment: Safeguarding Enterprise AI with Security and Governance
Watch Now View
Spotlight 11:29
Not Hype — Dye & Durham’s Analytics Head Shows What AI at Work Really Looks Like
Not Hype — Dye & Durham’s Analytics Head Shows What AI at Work Really Looks Like
Watch Now View
Spotlight 11:18
Rewiring Real Estate Finance — How Walker & Dunlop Is Giving Its $135B Portfolio a Data-First Refresh
Watch Now View
Spotlight
Choosing the Right DSPM: An Industry Analyst’s Perspective
Watch Now View
Spotlight 13:38
Accelerating Miracles — How Sanofi is Embedding AI to Significantly Reduce Drug Development Timelines
Sanofi Thumbnail
Watch Now View
Spotlight 10:35
There’s Been a Material Shift in the Data Center of Gravity
Watch Now View
Spotlight 14:21
AI Governance Is Much More than Technology Risk Mitigation
AI Governance Is Much More than Technology Risk Mitigation
Watch Now View
Latest
Australia’s Office of AI: Why Annual Audits Miss What Your AI Can Reach View More
Australia’s Office of AI: Why Annual Audits Miss What Your AI Can Reach
Picture this: a fictional but entirely plausible scenario. An Australian financial institution's AI systems spend six months accessing a customer data repository nobody has...
View More
A Complete DSPM Needs Classification and Context
Classification is one of the core functions a DSPM program handles, and it usually runs in tandem with discovery, since together they form the...
DSPM for SaaS Applications: 2026 Guide View More
DSPM for SaaS Applications: 2026 Guide
Learn how DSPM secures sensitive data across SaaS applications, from discovering shadow data and misconfigurations to controlling access and exposure.
The EU Cyber Resilience Act (CRA): A Complete Guide for Compliance View More
The EU Cyber Resilience Act (CRA): A Complete Guide for Compliance
Here’s what you need to know about the EU’s Cyber Resilience Act (CRA), including the best solutions to aid your compliance efforts. Read on...
Context Is the New Coverage View More
Context Is the New Coverage
Classification alone can’t secure data and AI. Learn why context like access, usage, and lineage is key to reducing risk across data and AI...
Stop Storing Risk: An Executive's Guide to ROT Data Minimization View More
Stop Storing Risk: An Executive’s Guide to ROT Data Minimization
An executive's guide to reducing redundant, obsolete, and trivial (ROT) data to cut storage costs, shrink your attack surface, and improve compliance.
The Toxic Combination Problem in DataAI Risks View More
The Toxic Combination Problem in DataAI Risks
Discover how siloed security alerts create hidden toxic risk combinations and how correlated context helps reduce alert fatigue and uncover compound risks faster.
The Cloud Storage Bill Nobody Reads View More
The Cloud Storage Bill Nobody Reads
Hidden cloud storage costs add up fast. Learn how redundant, obsolete, and trivial data drives unnecessary spend, expands risk, and why automated data minimization...
View More
Take the Data Risk Out of AI
Learn how to prepare enterprise data for safe Gemini Enterprise adoption with upstream governance, sensitive data discovery, and pre-index policy controls.
View More
Navigating HITRUST: A Guide to Certification
Securiti's eBook is a practical guide to HITRUST certification, covering everything from choosing i1 vs r2 and scope systems to managing CAPs & planning...
What's
New